Why julius caesar was a good leader

Personal blog about writing Who is a better leader Brutus or Antony? Order Management Why does Caesar not fear Cassius, however? What are Cassius weaknesses? Julius Caesar was becoming the leader of ancient Rome, and a group of greedy men murdered him and took away his chance of becoming a valuable leader. Therefore, Julius Caesar was a good leader. Julius Caesar is a book which a person should find noble people who going against each other for power, leadership, or control.

William Shakespeare was a lot inspired by the wars of his time period. If the leader does their job correctly, the country will be strong. A good leader must be able to make his own decisions because if he cannot, he will be considered a weak leader. A countrys leader must be able to communicate with the people as well because if he gets the people of the country to listen, then his job Improve your academic results!

Also, if the leader were noble to his countrymen, then there would not be any disputes within the country. In Julius Caesar, Mark Antony is a perfect example of a good leader. Not only is he a confident and noble person, he is also persuasive and that helps in becoming a good leader.

Antony would be a good leader of Rome because he is confident, noble, and persuasive. It feels like a sharp object is penetrating your skin and muscles very quickly and then said sharp object is removed. Same thing with being shot. Pulling the knife out will mean the damage of the knife wound as well as a now open wound, which will bleed far worse. Most skin wounds heal within 10 days. But even with proper treatment, a wound infection may occur.

Check the wound daily for signs of infection listed below. Return to have stitches or staples removed as instructed by your healthcare provider. Chest wounds as a general rule are not survivable for long periods of time without medical care, although there are exceptions all the time in clinical practice.

Head and neck are right out. In general, simpler wounds sealed with stitches, glue, or staples can take about 10 days to heal. Deeper stab wounds require long term treatment and follow-up care outside of the emergency room setting because the body will require more time to heal from the trauma.

Conclusion: It appears that asymptomatic patients with abdominal stab wounds may be discharged from the hospital after 12 hours of observation with little likelihood of missed injury. Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel. These included the ballista which could fire massive bolts and catapults, that could hurl rocks a great distance. Caesar in Gaul began to use these not as defensive weapons but as offensive weapons.

He could integrate these weapons into his offensive strategies and employ them in conjunction with the legionnaires and cavalry.

Caesar recognized that catapults and ballistas could break up the massed formations of the Gauls. This allowed the Roman general to attack much larger forces and defeat them. Caesar also used these heavy weapons very successfully in the invasion of Britain. He skillfully used the ballistas on his ships to break the British formations that prevented him from landing on the shore of southern England.

He was a pioneer in the offensive use of these weapons and employed them on the battlefield and not just in sieges. The only other ancient general who deployed artillery in this way was Alexander the Great. However, Caesar was also able to use artillery in a conventional way and he was a master of siege warfare.

He stormed many Celtic hill forts in Gaul by using ballistas and catapults, such as at the siege of Uxellodunum, in Gaul. Caesar was a risk-taker, and he regularly devised strategies that were potentially reckless.

However, his gambles were always calculated ones and he would take great care of his plans and his tactics and strategies were always well-thought-out. Caesar believed that the best way to win was by launching daring and rapid attacks. This made him an unconventional commander during this time period.

At times his risk-taking resulted in problems. This recklessness meant that he often advanced too quickly, and his supply lines could not keep pace.

It was noted at the time that Caesar would often run out of food on his campaigns. For example, when he defeated the Helvetii his troops had already run out of food and other supplies.

However, Caesar was ready to be reckless if he could achieve his twin goals of speed and surprise. It was often stated that Caesar was very fortunate, but his remarkable victories were usually a result of speed and tactical surprise. A good example of this was his victory at Thapsus in modern Tunisia, where his speed enabled him to defeat a larger force of Optimates and allied tribes.

Despite his aggressive tactics, Caesar was flexible and was a master of the strategic retreat. That is, he could disengage from a battle or situation and regroup and then fight when the circumstances were more advantageous. He was a great commander and never suffered a defeat in a battle, with the possible exception of the Battle of Dyrrhachium 48 BC.

He was able to prevail over many enemies, including those who were numerically superior and armies led by great commanders such as Pompey. Time and again, he demonstrated his genius on the battlefield. He was fortunate that he commanded an army that was very formidable, highly trained, and disciplined. However, the achievements of Caesar were unmatched in the Roman era.

The factors that have earned Caesar the reputation as one of the greatest generals of all time were his leadership skills. He could inspire and cajole his men, and under his command, they performed remarkable feats. Caesar was an innovator, and he was able to use artillery such as catapults in ways that changed the ancient battlefield. He was a brilliant strategist, and he emphasized speed and surprise, which ensured that the Roman general secured many victories against the odds.

Related DailyHistory. Why was Julius Caesar assassinated? How did Caesar's conquest of Gaul change both Rome and Gaul?