Hitler and Mussolini were kindred spirits in the creation, propagation, and decline of dictatorial rule in modern Europe. Their violent rise to power was met with violent ends. Difference Between Similar Terms and Objects. MLA 8 Ewan, Dart. Name required. Email required. Please note: comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment. Notify me of followup comments via e-mail.
Written by : de. User assumes all risk of use, damage, or injury. You agree that we have no liability for any damages.
Author Recent Posts. The coup failed and Hitler was thrown in jail. In their situation the population found hero worship as an essential antidote to fear since it provided hope The people in Italy under the fascist government were undergoing an oppressive and financially unstable time. Germany also faced many various money problems. Wealthy business men supported Hitler with their money to run his propaganda and election campaigns.
The Nazi propaganda influenced the Germans to believe that the Jews were to blame and that Hitler was their last hope. Hitler was seen as a figure that was needed to help restore the natural beauty of Germany.
He used various scandalous ideas to help advertise himself and win the election. Without popularity, there would be no way for dictators to achieve their ultimate goal. His political ideologies allowed him to grow in fame, gaining more supporters, and eventually being elected the leader of Germany. Hitler and the Nazi party prided themselves on brainwashing the German population, thus increasing his popularity. The size of the Nazi Party at its formation was infinitesimal in comparison to the powerhouse it grew into.
Its surge to power was not a result of simply violence and hard-power utilization, but rather due to effective strategy and a great deal of luck.
The economic and socio-political devastation that stemmed from World War I incited the collapse of German society and the Weimar Republic, allowing Hitler to effectively craft propaganda to promote his policies to a highly receptive German public that ended up bearing the stigma of his….
Appeasement and the League of Nations combined to help World War 2 come to be. Hitler got everything he asked for while appeasement was running becoming even more powerful. They started World War 2 to help accomplish this, showing the world how influential they were. Hitler led the Germans into war and convinced them that war was the right action Chapman.
When Germany complained of his double policy, Mussolini begged them not to be too offended if he had to tell lies to London. Thus, Britain and France were enemies for both Germany and Italy, although privately, Britain in particular, appreciated the importance of having one of these nations as an ally; however Britain was aware that an alliance with Italy or Germany was not publicly feasible.
Therefore, Italy and Germany were first and foremost drawn together due to their failed diplomatic ties with Britain and France. Yet, it demonstrates that Hitler was not prepared to support Italy wholly on the basis of their shared fascist connection. The way in which Hitler manipulated the issue of Abyssinia by supplying both Italy and Abyssinia illustrates he was prepared to politically manoeuvre around the international system to maximise German interests.
British and French political ostracism of Italy meant Mussolini was thrust into the arms of the Wehrmacht machine, in which the two countries established a genuine link; common enemies. Thus, Mussolini slowly begun to grasp that an alliance with Germany, the surrendering of Austria and the recognition of the conquest of Abyssinia were all inextricably linked. Therefore, Mussolini began to admit that the independence of Austria might have to be sacrificed as the price of an entente with Germany.
By , Mussolini depicted himself as a warrior of war which was exacerbated after his somewhat precarious avenge of Abyssinia, [25] and thus felt necessary to plough a great deal of Italian resources into the Spanish Civil War. However, Mussolini only agreed to commit a dozen transport planes initially, yet this would steadily increase when he learned that Nazi Germany was supplying help too.
Thus, this insinuates the degree of competition between the two countries. Yet, it illustrates to some extent that the Rome-Berlin Axis had more in common that common enemies. However, this can be scrutinised from a different perspective too, in that their joint hatred of Communism led them to join forces. Thus this would allude to the notion that joint participation in the Spanish Civil War was on the basis of a common enemy; communism.
Mussolini continued to lend support to Spain despite reservations from Italian military advisors, in which they rightly claimed that Italian resources were limited. Thus, a war weary Italy became increasingly reliant upon Germany as an ally, to the extent that the onset of the Spanish Civil War meant he could no longer stand at Brenner alone. The Brenner bypass had become a potent symbol of Italian resistance against the forthcoming Anschluss, however as international circumstances dictated Mussolini thought it would be wise to sacrifice Starhemberg in order to placate Hitler.
Thus, this pre-empts the divergence within relations and illustrates to an even greater degree how little these two nations had in common. This is reaffirmed by Denis Mack Smith who noted that the countries might differ on minor points, but they had the same enemies.
Therefore, these three significant events changed the dynamism between Italy and Germany to large degree. By the end of , Hitler had established himself as the more politically powerful partner out of the two. In addition, it was obvious that the Italians did not feel the same way in this period.
In essence, they were both revisionist powers that drew together to maximise their own interests and enhance their status within Europe and the world. The year was a crucial year for the Rome-Berlin Axis as Hitler completed his longstanding ambition of achieving the Anschluss — something that the Italians had vehemently opposed in the past. During this period, it was not the common ideology that drew the two countries together at this point but the international circumstances, which proved more favourable for the Germans in satisfying their hostile foreign policy.
The independence of Austria was the most antagonist issue to divide Germany and Italy. However, the desire to maintain this buffer zone is also demonstrative of the tense relationship in which Rome and Berlin shared, in that the former did not wish to share a border with the latter. However as international circumstances dictated, along with Hitler driving a hard bargain, it became increasingly difficult for Mussolini to deny Hitler Austria.
Although Rome-Berlin relations improved, it was Hitler-Mussolini relations that witnessed the greatest improvement as a result of the Anchluss. Hitler deeply respected Mussolini for not moving over the Anchluss issue and this gratitude for the Duce would stay with Hitler predominately throughout the war years. In there were on an equal platform, however by Germany began to politically ascend over Italy further accentuating how little they had in common.
Although the extent to which this agreement was futile from its beginnings appears to be likely. Mussolini had publicly declared his allegiance to Germany too vehemently in the past to consider a genuine rapprochement with the West. Furthermore from the British perspective, Italy had become too much a radical power, thus diplomatic ties concluded.
The conference only proceeded because the British appealed for him to use his influence with the Germans, and hence he seemed to hold the scales between peace and war.
Furthermore, the extent in which he as was genuine arbiter can be questioned as he gave Hitler advance warning that he would support the German claim. Mussolini may have been diplomatically victorious on the day but he was really a victim of a German initiative.
The difficulties in the partnership became apparent when Hitler still did not trust Italy with key military strategies. He was given a chance to break the shared bond of common enemies with Germany at Munich by realigning with Britain and France, however he decided to formally align himself with Hitler to an even greater extent, to a degree in which Italy unknowingly and rather blindly served the interests of Germany rather than itself.
Thus in Italy and Germany still shared common enemies, and it also seemed they had the public cementing of this uneasy alliance in common and the shared hope that this troubled coalition would reap great rewards for themselves.
0コメント